/teal-sea
teal-sea / zeta-labstate of record · compiled 28 Sep 2026 · revision e4945c4 · source

Library · hunts/rogue_frontier/window_opt/global_notes.md

global_notes: working checkpoint for the global-optimality study of F(v)

2,043 words · 252 lines · source

Session scratch log, updated incrementally. Nothing here is a result until it reaches RESULTS.md section 9 with a grade. No em dashes; the reserved word of zeta/rigor.py is not used in this directory.

0. Validation gate (done)

1. Reformulation used by the bound work (derivation notes)

With l1 = int v = 1 (scale invariance) and m_k the limiting spectral moments of A = H/l1 (the source paper's framework, hardened closed forms in functional.py):

m0 = 1, m1 = 1, m2 = 1 + D2, m3 = 1 + 3 D2 + D3

so D2 = m2 - 2 m1 + m0 and D3 = m3 - 3 m2 + 3 m1 - m0 are the second and third central moments of the spectral measure mu_v about 1:

D2 = int (lam - 1)^2 dmu, D3 = int (lam - 1)^3 dmu, F = 2 m2 - m3 = 1 - int lam (lam - 1)^2 dmu.

Since A is PSD, mu_v lives on [0, inf), so lam (lam-1)^2 >= 0 and F <= 1 (per-N: E nu_N is a positive measure with these moments; Cauchy-Schwarz and positivity hold at every N, then pass to the limit that defines m_k).

Cauchy-Schwarz (m2^2 <= m1 m3 for a positive measure on [0, inf)) gives

F <= 2 m2 - m2^2 = 1 - D2^2 (pointwise in v)

and 1 - D2^2 is decreasing in D2 >= 0, so

sup F <= 1 - (inf D2)^2.

D2 = <v, (I - T) v> / l1^2 with (T f)(xi) = int_B tri(xi - eta) f(eta) deta, tri(t) = 1 - |t| on |t| <= 1, B = [-1/2, 1/2]. T is PSD (Fourier multiplier sinc^2 >= 0), ||T||_HS^2 = tr T^2 = 1/2 exactly, so ||T|| <= 1/sqrt(2) < 1.

Lower bound for inf D2 via the quadratic dual: for any c, <v, (I-T) v> >= 2 c <1, v> - c^2 <1, (I-T)^{-1} 1>, so with U >= <1, (I-T)^{-1} 1> = sum_k t_k, t_k := <1, T^k 1>: inf_{int v = 1} D2 >= 1/U. t_k are exact rationals (T maps polynomials to polynomials, degree + 2). Tail bound for even K: sum_{k >= K} t_k <= t_K / (1 - lam_max) and lam_max <= 1/sqrt(2) <= 707107/1000000 (since 707107^2 >= 5*10^11).

Everything in the chain is exact rational. Status: derivation written, code next (global_bound.py).

2. Landscape plan (global_landscape.py)

3. Slice plan (global_slice.py)

Findings so far

F1 (prototype, 2026-08-17): exact rational bound chain works

t_k = <1, T^k 1> computed exactly (t_1 = 2/3, t_2 = 9/20 match hand derivation). Ratios t_{k+1}/t_k converge to lam_1(T) = 0.6755169434391893, comfortably below the exact HS bound 1/sqrt(2) used only for the tail. With K = 44: U = 3.0534416857, 1/U = 0.32749929520, sup F <= 1 - (1/U)^2 = 0.8927442116. Every constant is an exact rational. Note inf D2 = 0.3274993 sits close to D2(v*) = 0.3280521: the F-optimum is nearly the D2 minimizer.

F2 (prototype): cosine spectral landscape, J = 6, 40 starts

All 40 least-squares runs on the projected EL system converged; 3 distinct critical points: the known optimum (38 hits, v > 0, F = 0.685275 at this truncation), and two sign-changing solutions outside the cone (F = 0.5243, 0.4303). Unique interior critical point in this span. Truncation note: the cosine basis converges slowly for this problem (the optimum's periodic extension has endpoint derivative kinks), so the restricted critical value sits below 0.68528703 at small J; J up to 12 in the production run.

F4 (2026-08-17, global_bound.py run complete): derived outer bound

Gate: T-machinery agrees with functional.py exactly (D2(v*) = m2 - 1 as an identity of Fractions between two independent codes). Results:

F5 (2026-08-17, global_slice.py run complete): quartic slice EXACT

F6: the relaxation value is itself pinned (both sides)

The outer bound is the exact value of a relaxation: among positive measures on [0, inf) with mean 1 and second central moment >= inf D2, the maximum of int (2 lam^2 - lam^3) is exactly 1 - (inf D2)^2, attained by mu = (d/(1+d)) delta_0 + (1/(1+d)) delta_{1+d}, d = inf D2 (the dual polynomial lam (lam - (1+d))^2 >= 0 touches at both atoms). With the inf D2 bracket [1/U, D2(w_24)] this pins the relaxation value to [0.8927442109, 0.8927442116]. So the derived bound cannot be improved by computing harder; it can only be improved by adding facts the relaxation does not know, i.e. by excluding near-two-point spectral measures for actual windowed sine-Gram operators. That exclusion is genuine spectral theory (the transition-layer behavior of band-limiting Gram operators) and is the honestly-open part of the global question.

F7: exact factor bookkeeping for the slice critical point

The admissible root q2 = 1.15904242554051 is a root of the quartic factor 53574903041239 q2^4 - 7719414292779072 q2^3 - 126958598530649600 q2^2

cubic factor's single real root 67.389 is inadmissible). Exact separation F4* - F(v*) = 1.5483e-12 > 0, and F4* < measured full sup by 8.887e-9.

F8: exact rational witness on the degree-8 slice (sup lower bound)

v8(s) = 1 - (36773/25000) s^2 + (744/625) s^4 + (1341/25000) s^6

is exactly admissible (Sturm: psi(u) = 1 + q1 u + ... has zero roots in [0, 1/4], psi(1/4) = 141077/200000 > 0, so v > 0 on B) and achieves, in exact rational arithmetic,

F(v8) = 8273865220036096559249598473358/12073576226528772158039668492375 = 0.685287032176620,

within 3.5e-13 of the measured sup 0.6852870321770. Together with F4:

0.685287032176620 <= sup F <= 0.892744211644411,

both ends exact rationals: the lower end by an explicit admissible witness, the upper end by the derived chain.

F9: exact evaluation of the recorded Chebyshev witness

The best_window.json Chebyshev coefficients define w exactly (dyadic rationals); v = w^2 is a degree-28 even polynomial, nonnegative by construction. Exact rational evaluation:

F = 0.6852870321769988738698323 (25 digits; exact fraction available)

so the two-sided bracket tightens to

0.685287032176999 <= sup F <= 0.892744211644412 (both ends exact).

The lower end is 2.0e-12 below the float-measured sup 0.6852870321770008.

F10 (2026-08-17, global_landscape.py full run complete): landscape

Gate: independent mpmath evaluator matched the exact rational to 50 digits; 30-digit cos reference reproduced to < 1e-28.

Final exact two-sided bracket: 0.685287032176998 <= sup F <= 0.892744211644412.

RESULTS.md section 9 written (landscape, bound, slices, verdict); Files list updated. Lexical scan of everything: clean.

F3 (prototype): quartic slice is exactly solvable

Symbolic F(q1, q2) rational of degree 3/3; sympy reproduces the exact rational F(v*) from functional.py. Critical system Groebner basis: lex, univariate element of degree 7 in q2 with 5 real roots: q2 = -62.573, 1.1590424255405073, 67.389, 87.446, 118.055. The second is the optimizer's basin. Admissibility of the others TBD in global_slice.py; boundary families and directional limits at infinity to be solved exactly (plan in section 3 above, expanded):